"on the QT" or Quick Take, presents for consumption and comment random observations of life in the present.
April 1, 2017
Does God Exist?
Debating whether there is a God or not is a fool's endeavor unless it/he/she shows his hand.
Nevertheless the time has come to rigorously critique Darwin's theory of evolution/natural selection.
Darwin knew nothing of genetics, nothing of cellular organization, nothing of organic chemistry, almost
nothing of paleontology, no idea of the true age of the earth, and only a superficial qualitative
understanding of statistical analysis. Yet, his theory is taught in schools to the exclusion of
any other hypothesis. This is important since the more we learn about the complexity of living
organisms, the more tenuous his theory becomes.
Given we'll most likely never know our true origin or history for lack of evidence, we should try to find comfort in whatever we choose to believe and leave it at that.
posted by John Herman 3:41 PM
January 25, 2017
NEW-for-2017 Phrenicea T-Shirt!
The "T-shirt of the Future"!
Enter the contest to win!
posted by John Herman 11:45 AM
June 28, 2013
DiNAs in Space!
Paypal recently announced that they will be exploring the concept of "space payments," with the expectation that space tourism will
take off in the next decade, and humans will then need to pay for things while in space and be able to send payments back to earth.
They need look no farther out than the Phrenicea website(!), as we have proposed over a decade ago that there will not be any need for
money in the future. Phrenicea will facilitate financial transactions which will then be
recorded forever on a man-made 24th-chromosome pair, colloquially referred to as "brainerama." All the world's
coin, currency as well as electronic funds will be replaced with what will commonly be refered to as "soma-cash" or "tissue-issue."
As stated on Phrenicea's "No Money" web page:
"Almost everyone's financial assets and liabilities will become part of his physical body, accessible to Phrenicea via its engagement
to effect transactions for the transfer "DiNAs," the DNA-based unit of wealth."
posted by John Herman 2:05 PM
April 19, 2010
You found us!
If you are reading this it is quite remarkable. There's an estimated 180 million
websites worldwide and the number is growing daily. So how did you get here? Was it Google? Another search engine? Random web surfing?
The Phrenicea website has been online since 2000 and has garnered respectable
visitor traffic despite non-commercial and esoteric content. But
these might be considered its good-old-days in terms of what the Internet marketing experts call "eyeballs."
Why? Because the Internet is growing exponentially in size.
In the early days of TV there were only three main stations to watch - CBS, NBC and ABC. Today
viewership is diluted across literally hundreds channels. To use the TV analogy vis-à-vis the Internet is not
unreasonable given the Internet is still a relatively new phenomenon. Thus, today's almost 200 million websites could one day
balloon to over a billion. (Hopefully the analogy will not apply to web quality as well.)
So, we're honored and happy to have you with us today. With all of your ever increasing distractions and everyday activities competing for your time, we may never have you join us again!
posted by John Herman 9:12 AM
January 1, 2009
A Disgraced General
In General Motors' heyday its chairman Charles Wilson uttered the famous
phrase, "What's good for the country is good for GM and vice versa."
Wilson's self-serving declaration in the early 1950's is still apt today, albeit within the ironic context
of government bailouts.
GM is trying to recover from decades of short-term strategies and practices
that first wrecked its spectrum of brands (Chevrolet to Cadillac)
yielding five tarnished, almost fungible nameplates — followed by the near-sighted emphasis on gas-guzzling behemoths. Equally foolish, it established in 1985 yet another division christened
Saturn, wasting billions in the process. (Imagine if all that capital was applied instead to advanced hybrid technology.) And not many it seems are forgetting the dismal reputation it earned so well for shoddy workmanship.
GM leveraged its brand equity to excess — yielding five tarnished, almost
These days GM's cars are better built while it hopes to soon shock us with the new
But it will take as many years to repair the company's reputation as it took to
squander it. Most would rather just play it safe with a Toyota, Honda or Nissan. General Motors and the other U.S. car manufacturers arrogantly underestimated the intelligence of consumers.
As events play out daily it appears that as a result of years of U.S. corporate mismanagement,
no matter the industry:
What's is good for the country is good for a foreign company —
a reality euphemistically touted as "globalization."
posted by John Herman 1:31 AM
April 27, 2008
It's about time! Green 1.0 failed because it relied on objective scientific data and rational pleas.
Green 2.0 is the result of through-the-roof gas and oil prices and subjective outrage.
Green is cool (no pun intended).
Let's hope it's more than a fleeting fad.
posted by John Herman 11:26 AM
February 6, 2008
Always on the lookout for convenient yet healthy foods, I was delighted to find Quaker Oats
finally came out with a single-serving instant oatmeal without artificial ingredients, as part of
their new whole grain "Simple Harvest"
line. Unable to throttle my excitement, I quickly snatched six boxes from the supermarket shelf.
A long-time fan of their original "classic" instant, even with its sweet artificial flavoring, I eventually learned to
reduce my early-morning sugar hit by skillfully sifting out of the bowl almost two tablespoons of
sugar — and it still was too sweet. So the Big Question was, Would I be able to
skip this ritual with this new healthier variant?
Anxious to find out, I opened a box right from the shopping bag only to have my enthusiasm
immediately tempered. Instead of a simple brown paper packet used for years with the not-so-natural
version, the new package is made of environmentally unfriendly plastic. Made even more ironic
then was their declaration of responsibility printed on the box,
"At Quaker, we're committed to reducing our environmental impact through creative solutions
for minimizing waste — like using oat hulls as a renewable resource."
"That's one small step for nutrition, one giant leap behind for waste."
Sugar and artificial flavors;
Not so good for YOU
Not so good for all of US
As I see it, this is "One small step for nutrition, one giant leap behind for waste."
(Message to Quaker: Never mind the oat hulls. Brag instead about an environmentally friendly solution for Simple
On a more positive note, the answer to the Big Question is: Simple Harvest is a lot less
sweet — only a tiny bit of sifting is now required.
posted by John Herman 7:06 PM
November 19, 2007
BC vs. PC
Recently I had the opportunity to visit New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, a wonderful place to view
and appreciate man-made artifacts going back to at least 1000 BC. It makes you realize that human
intelligence is not unique to modern times — which we tend to discount.
Although the entire museum is impressive, particularly stunning is a 4th century BC marble
from its original height) prominently displayed in the Ancient Greece section of the museum. The detailed
carving of the stone boggles the mind as to the amount of time spent hand chiseling to create the
capital's foliate ornaments and the fine scale pattern at the base. Incredible too is that
these massive objects were erected and maneuvered into position without modern machinery.
And to think, it was interminable idle time that in effect produced much of the museum's collection
of timeless art. Fortunately BC was before the PC and today's hectic pace; otherwise
the museum might be almost empty!
With all of our technical prowess — what are we creating today that will be around in 2,500 years —
other than waste plastic and mega-tons of carbon dioxide?
posted by John Herman 8:06 AM
October 31, 2007
Defining the Definer
As in the August 24th QT below, this installment is inspired by googling on Google. Another alert visitor discovered
that when he miss-keyed phrenicea with the suffix ia instead of ea, Google's response was,
"Did you mean: Phrenicea."
(Google in effect did a spell check on the search argument.)
Intrigued, I tried several misspelled words to see if Google would attempt to correct my fumbling
fingers. "Did you mean: House" was the result of entering houce. "Did you mean: architecture"
was the result from entering arciteckture. "Did you mean: Google" was the result of entering gogle.
Then it occurred to me to ask:
Given that Google recognizes legitimate words and apparently considers this website a distinct
entity; Will it, or perhaps an eventual successor, one day replace
Webster's as the official arbiter
of wordhood? Will prosaic hardware and software replace human judgment to become the new authority as to what are
acceptable words for mortal communication?
I usually side with flesh-and-blood humans — but in this case I'm betting my chips on the lifeless,
silicon-based server farm.
So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen, goodbye Mr. Webster.
posted by John Herman 7:43 AM
August 24, 2007
Needle in a Haystack
Swapping emails recently with a new visitor of Phrenicea revealed she had found us by googling
the phrase 21st century future. Intrigued, I tried it and was astonished that Phrenicea placed
seventh out of 49,500,000 sites.
Then it occurred to me to ask:
Given that Google employs the brightest minds and is perceived to be the
number one search engine — why would they bother serving up a list of almost 50 million websites, a ridiculous
result beyond the practical ability for any human to consume? Talk about having too much information!
It will be interesting to see if Google eventually rectifies this absurdity or perhaps this leaves
open an opportunity for another innovative startup.
posted by John Herman 8:59 AM
August 10, 2007
Our May Two-Cents weblog essay discusses the increasing use of the "2.0" suffix originating from
the term Web 2.0, which implies "this is what's next." Spotted so far in the popular media:
"Banking 2.0," "Organic 2.0," and even "Mitt Romney 2.0."
Here I'd like to coin [no pun intended] another variation; "Trash 2.0."
As inflation eats away at the value of our currency, particularly low denomination coin, I've been coming across more
and more pennies, nickels and even dimes at my feet — as it's apparently not worth it
(or too embarrassing) to bend over and pick up what was once considered good luck as well as
a tiny windfall.
With inflation's unending advance, I can't help but imagine a day when we'll be walking over a
blanket of lost change without a second thought. Then perhaps inflation will already have us looking
ahead to Trash 3.0...
posted by John Herman 1:37 PM
© Brian Crane Dist. by The Washington Post Writers Group
cartoon postscript — July 27, 2008
July 6, 2007
Our July Two-Cents weblog essay uses these lazy, hazy, crazy days of summer as an opportunity
to revisit our condition of "water on the brain." The disorder makes us extremely conscious of our daily
water usage and has us asking others to:
"Pretend you were to pay $1/gallon the next time you take a shower or bath, brush your teeth,
flush a toilet, wash the dishes, or God forbid — water the lawn! Begin to use less water than
the average person. Set an example. Prevent H2Ouch!"
The symptoms even spill over into reading the comics:
© 2007 Baby Blues Partnership. Reprinted with Special
Permission of King Features Syndicate.
Did Zoe and Hammie's tub really have to be filled to the brim?
Thankfully this hyperhydro affliction lasts about a month and only occurs annually. In the meantime,
pretend you were to pay $1/gallon the next time you take a shower or bath, brush your teeth,
flush a toilet, wash the dishes...
posted by John Herman 12:44 PM
May 28, 2007
Fuel for Thought
There's a lot of hype these days about hybrid cars. I guess that's a good thing. It's a bit confusing though,
since there are several configurations including gasoline/electric, hydrogen/electric,
and plug-ins. Each approach has its disadvantages, be it cost, range, or practicality.
For example, hydrogen power sounds great — its byproduct is drinkable water! But the
reality of storing hydrogen and distributing it is not trivial, and could even be dangerous.
Plug-ins sound great too but their range is very limited. And I'm not sure if transferring the
energy source to the centralized power grid is really smart, since most power generators are
driven by fossil fuel. That just changes the source of pollution from tailpipes to smokestacks.
I believe our best bet is leveraging the sun and the existing power grid already connected to
most sources of consumption. If solar cells could be made efficient enough, each user would
likely produce more energy than consumed, making the grid a practical receiver as well as supplier
This is not a pipe dream. Consider that the sun for billions of years has essentially been the sole
energy source for life to emerge, survive and evolve on earth. Now it's up to us to become smart
enough to capture this abundance of potential, which for the most part is wasted as radiant heat.
Even the peripatetic auto might one day become an energy source. Witness the sensation you feel as you put
your hand on a car's paint on a sunny day. Imagine if that paint could convert the sun's
rays into electricity, not unlike a tree capturing photon energy via the chlorophyll in its
leaves. A car would most times be able to store more energy than it consumed. Multiply that by
the millions of cars on the world's roads and plug-ins could conceivably feed the grid as well.
What we must do is lobby for a crash program for research, development and deployment of solar
technologies that try to equal nature's ability to utilize energy that's free for the taking.
That would be energy well spent.
posted by John Herman 05:49 PM
April 7, 2007
The more things change...
It's amazing what people will auction and buy on eBay these days. I recently
stumbled upon an auction for a RCA TV ad from 1967. Not the TV, but an old magazine
ad touted as "Suitable for framing." Wow!
Intrigued, I did a few searches on the vintage TV. Imagine paying $2000 for a TV in 1967 (a small fortune), where
state-of-the-art was a 23" screen, stereo speakers on each side and a remote control button. Wow!
The ad copy was rendered in then-futuristic MICR-like font blazoning "RCA invites 2000 people with $2000 to
leap into the year 2000." It continued:
Introducing the RCA set of the future: The Two Thousand. First and most obvious, is its 21st-century design.
Sitting like a silent spaceship, its sculptured whiteness curves to a rosewood veneer top. The black translucent
doors slide back and disappear into the set, revealing a 23-inch diagonal screen.
Wow, that's exclusive all right — providing a certain entitlement to boast. Legend has it that Elvis had several
of them, and even shot the screen out on one of them. Ah, what trivia you can learn on the Internet.
And what a picture you'll see on that screen.
It's our new Hi-Lite 70 tube—computer designed and engineered for 100% more brightness than any big screen
color tube we've ever made. The Hi-Lite tube gives such a vivid, detailed picture, you can even watch it in a
brightly lit room.
The remote controls of color, tint and volume have electronic memories. They operate electronically. So there are
no motors, no noise, and no moving parts to wear out or break down.
We've eliminated the conventional VHF tuner. In its place are new electronic circuits with memories like tiny
computers. When you press the remote-control button, the circuits automatically remember which channels were active.
You simply go from one live station to the next.
The Two Thousand was made possible this soon with the help of computers. We used their speed and accuracy in
many ways. To help design key systems. Or inspect them. Or test them for optimum performance and reliability.
Imagine. Once for $2000 , all you got was a trip around the world. Now you can travel to a whole new century.
What's really striking however, if you ignore its depth, is how
similar it looks (with its doors shut)
to today's state-of-the-art 103" Panasonic plasma TV — retailing for just $70,000. Legend has it that Elvis...
But here's what it takes for bragging rights today:
With industry leading 16-bit color reproduction, the super-size TH-103PF9UK provides stunning widescreen
progressive display featuring full HD pixel resolution of 1,920 horizontal x 1,080 vertical, a contrast
ratio of 5,000:1, and 4,096 equivalent steps of color gradation, delivering clear, crisp and impactful
fast action video images. This 1080p display’s screen resolution, which amounts to about 2 million pixels,
equals twice the resolution of high-definition televisions that are commonly available today.
Wow, memorize that for the water cooler or watering hole!
The TH-103PF9UK can display 1080/60p/50p, 1080/60i/50i/24p/24sF/25p/30p, 1080/50i, 720/60p/50p 480/60i/p,
and 575/50i/p video signals. As the largest member of Panasonic’s high-performing professional plasma display
family, the TH-103PF9UK features three interchangeable, multi-function slots (in the back panel) which allow
users to add and update their panel with different combinations of optional terminal boards for a variety of
applications. The 103” plasma display comes standard with the TY-FB9DD DVI board (compatible with UXGA input),
TY-42TM6A analog component board, an integrated D-sub15 PC input, and an integrated D-sub9 RS232C interface.
Optional plug-in boards assure expanded connectivity, including HD-SDI and DVI, as well as a variety of
advanced functionality including monitor control, networking, running of internal applications and data
storage, and remote signal playback.
Technology changes, but not much else. Imagine how foolish you too would appear some 40
years hence spending all that dough today on such a tiny plasma TV.
posted by John Herman 11:43 AM
February 14, 2007
The Pot Calling the Kettle Black?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
"The phrase 'Pot calling the kettle black' is an idiom, used to accuse another speaker of hypocrisy,
in that the speaker disparages the subject in a way that could equally be applied to him or her.
In former times cast iron pots and kettles were quickly blackened from the soot of the fire, so it
seems ridiculous of the pot to call the kettle black."
In modern times we also have the pressure cooker of bad publicity.
The latest issue (March '07, page 16) of Consumer Reports investigates "An Accident Waiting to Happen,"
whereby "To save money, airlines [here the kettles] have outsourced many of their operations, from baggage handling to
on-board catering... and work to maintain planes — fixing wheels, repairing engines, and more."
What the magazine (now the pot) didn't report was its own use of outsourcing. It had to retract its January
18 article (February '07 issue, page 12) containing an inflammatory report on the safety of infant
car seats. In an email to subscribers, Jim Guest, president of the magazine apologetically explains, "Some of the questions
I've heard involve our use of an outside lab to conduct the crash tests... [W]e sometimes use outside
So it appears the now black-marked magazine has "waiting to happen" certain lawsuits by the seat
I guess some of those old sayings (idioms) from former times will continue to be relevant even in the
posted by John Herman 7:08 PM
February 7, 2007
The Future is now (or yesterday?)...
This just read in a local newspaper:
"Due at U.S. dealerships in March, the '08 [Porche] Cayenne sport utility vehicle will be available..."
"Ford Motor Co. says it has lowered the prices on its face-lifted 2008 Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner.
They go on sale in the first quarter."
Here we are barely two months into the new year and some 2008 cars are already going on sale.
If this keeps up we'll have our cars several years by the time the calendar year finally catches up
with their model year, and the definition of "new" and "old" will blur.
posted by John Herman 06:56 PM
Thursday January 18, 2007
emailway igpay atinlay...
While reading the curriculum vitae of a neurobiology researcher on the University of Washington's faculty website
page, I could not help noticing his posted email address approaching a high-tech form of
Pig Latin [changed for anonymity]:
bcroiden at u dot washington dot edu
Isn't it pathetic that a professor has to resort to such obfuscation to avoid malicious spiders searching
for email addresses to flood them with spam?
What a sorry state of affairs that whatever technology is developed for good and productive purposes
is hijacked by individuals bent on greed or just plain unscrupulousness.
I shudder to think about at what lengths we'll have to go to thwart these despicable perpetrators
of deception as technology marches on. Will the disadvantages of technology advancement eventually
outweigh its benefits?
Are we already there?
posted by John Herman 8:02 PM
Thursday January 4, 2007
The Future isn't now...
I'm an "On This Day" in history buff. Imagine that 47 years ago, on
January 2, 1960,
Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts announced his candidacy for the Democratic presidential
nomination. Now you have to remember that the election was held on November 8 of that same year!
It's hard now to fathom a presidential campaign beginning in the same year as the election, although
it sure would be a welcome regression.
What has changed in the years since that time to cause us to have to endure a campaign for president
beginning two years before the election? Already the pundits are debating whether Obama will trump Hillary;
or if Guiliani has an edge over McCain. Does anyone care yet?
Perhaps it's the same reason why we're already seeing bathing suits on display at the mall.
We're living our lives in future mode, which along with our constantly-connected-and-in-touch
gadgets makes for one hectic ride.
I long for the slower pace of the "Good Ol' Days," when the present really was the present, and not months
or years into the future.
posted by John Herman 7:22 PM
Jeff Stahler: © Columbus Dispatch/Dist. by Newspaper Enterprise Association, Inc.
cartoon postscript — February 19
Thursday November 16, 2006
Don't Tread On Junior...
'Tis the season to receive countless holiday catalogs in the mail.
Although most of them immediately find their way to the recycle bin, I could not help but notice the most
ridiculous gift ensemble to date: "Junior Shape-Up Exercise Equipment" consisting of a treadmill,
elliptical machine and stationary bike designed for children "4 and up."
It's bad enough adults who are health conscious have to subject themselves to non-productive indoor torture to make up for
all the "labor saving" devices invented in the last 60 or 70 years.
It's bad enough too that so many teenagers should be using exercise machinery instead of playing with today's computers and
Now, children as young as four years of age will be encouraged to abandon natural play to exercise on machines. Most adults can't
muster the discipline to use exercise equipment for anything more than a convenient station to drape clothing. Imagine
a very young child with an attention span of seconds.
You can be sure though that there'll be plenty of silly parents coughing up the $100 (sale price!) for each.
Why not donate that money to charity instead and buy the kiddies an inexpensive sled, ball, (motorless) scooter,
or a real bike — and let them be kids at least until they're eight or nine.
posted by John Herman 8:10 PM
Sunday October 1, 2006
A Fob Sob Story...
Below is an actual email from a colleague who will remain anonymous. Just six months ago
he was bragging about his brand new Infiniti's key fob that allowed him to start the engine
just by pushing a button on the dash, as long as the fob was somewhere near the car.
"So I went to the collision shop at 8am to pick up my car.
Now in the not-so-old days before all the fancy electronics, the service staff would have to keep
track of where the key was, since it would have to be inserted into the ignition.
Only one problem. They couldn't find the keyfob.
But, the car starts. So, it must be in the car — although they searched it.
I told him he had to find it, or anyone could take the car.
He got all of his shop personnel to look for it. It had slid under the passenger
front seat into the heater duct. They removed the passenger seat to find it."
This is just one humorous story, and unintended consequence, of technology used for
technology's sake, and not necessarily to make our lives simpler or better.
I would expect that these types of unfortunate but humorous stories will become more common
as technology marches on.
posted by John Herman 5:23 PM
Friday September 8, 2006
Gauging from early voting in our current Phrenicea Quikpoll#23,
it's becoming apparent that the majority of voters dismiss concerns over potential health risks
associated with the use of cell phones and their emitted radiation.
At the same time, people talk about the danger of living or working near cell phone towers due to electromagnetic pollution.
"We're not going to put ourselves and especially our kids at risk from something that might cause cancer or other problems,"
is a typical assertion.
Isn't it curious that people exhibit this NIMBYism and oppose the installation of cell phone towers near
their back yards, yet they have no concern whatsoever about their family's use of phones that are literally
stuck to the sides of their heads — and communicating with these towers via microwaves!
posted by John Herman 1:58 PM
Thursday August 10, 2006
No fly-by-night silhouette...
Is it only me or does the sight of an airliner in the sky still evoke the horror of 911; a flying weapon
of mass destruction? Perhaps it's time to change that silhouette — maybe to a delta-winged craft
resembling the space shuttle.
It's been about 50 years since the first modern jet airliner appeared on the horizon (so to speak) and nothing much
design-wise has changed since. That's the same time span as from 1910 to 1960! Check out the
design of planes from the WWI period vs. the 1950s — that's from triplanes to the famous Boeing 707. Have we stagnated or what?
What happened to progress?
posted by John Herman 8:11 PM
Friday July 28, 2006
Passat, Golf and now...
Volkswagen announced the name of its new compact SUV will be Tiguan, which is
coined from the words tiger and leguan (German for iguana). A
tiger-iguana hybrid? What were they thinking? It's better than yet another IX, GX, QX,
PX, LX letter combination. But really, a tiger and an iguana? Ouch!
It's a good thing Phrenicea, the name of this website, coined from the words phrenic
(of the mind) and panacea (cure all), is a registered mark. Imagine driving around in
a Phrenicea! That's almost as tongue-tying as Chevrolet!
So, just imagine bragging to your friends that you just bought a Tiguan. It may be wise to break it to them
via email or text message...
posted by John Herman 7:05 PM
Wednesday July 19, 2006
Coping with gas...
News reports indicate that so far our driving habits have not changed much since the price of gas hit
three dollars and more. Other habits appear to be changing however. Personal observations at the pump reveal that
many are not filling up, but are frequenting the stations with $20 cash purchases. I even witnessed
a $10 transaction which was adeptly executed with a split-second squirt of the nozzle.
I've been coping by switching from cash to credit cards. Somehow it is easier to accept
a fill-up costing over $40 by handing over the plastic than forking over paper.
posted by John Herman 9:35 AM
Tuesday July 18, 2006
I have to go...
Have you noticed that people tend to say "I have to go to a funeral..." or "I have to go to a
wake..."? This is understandable. But have you also noticed that we often catch ourselves saying,
"I have to go to a wedding..."? Why is that? Perhaps it's because we're all tired of the same old
routine, the absence of spontaneity, the obsession with perfection and capturing the moment in pictures
and video which has become a big business. Ironically, the moment being saved ends up not being
genuine and — boring. Sadly too, all the fuss is likely moot — unless the marriage is one
of the few that defies the odds of divorce. Nevertheless, it would be nice to one day attend a
marriage celebration that was truly that; and not unintentionally say, "I have to go..."
posted by John Herman 6:10 AM
Chronicling the Future®
Please note that submitted comments will be reviewed prior to posting on this website.